Hand to Mouth: Assistive Technology

Entries tagged as ‘low-tech’

Writing/communication aids: low tech

November 30, 2009 · Leave a Comment

I’ve been thinking about writing aids. I write very seldom because it’s often hard to control the pen, and therefore slow and shaky and laborious. I waste a lot of paper when my capital letters go wavering across it like dismayed stick figures. And yet when my speech or my voice goes, that’s what I’m left with. (Yes, I do have an AlphaSmart, but it’s not something I can carry around just in case, and this happens so rarely.) There’s nothing as portable as a pen or pencil, if you’re able to use them.

I do carry an alphabet with me at all times — that is, I can fingerspell, though more slowly now than I’d like. The problem with that is most people can’t read it. It has worked a few times, though. If you think something like that would be useful, here’s a fingerspelling quiz with other links to learn the alphabet. If you literally want to carry an alphabet with you, you could print out a picture of a keyboard and point to the letters on it, or print out a table with common words on it. (I’m aware there are more expensive options out there, but the less expensive options tend to come to mind first. This goes for pretty much everything.)

But usually I find myself indicating pen and paper, with a very patient person reading over my shoulder. It’s inconvenient for both of us, at least in terms of the time it takes. I don’t know if any writing aids would stop the tremor or not, but the Evo Pen looks interesting. There are other possibilities on the ErgoCube site.

Categories: Disability
Tagged: , ,

Review: Bookchair “just right” bookholder

June 1, 2009 · Leave a Comment

You know you’re a word person when your books have more furniture than you do. Over the past few months I bought myself 2 “Bookchairs,” which have a semi-Goldilocks feel about them — I have a Medium one for paperbacks and a Large one for the computer books, but haven’t found a reason I would need the mini one.  They’re  book holders with pegs to keep your place, but they look like folding beach chairs that beat up Snoopy in Charlie Brown’s Thanksgiving. (Pardon the mixed similes.) These, however, are multicolored and nonviolent — they won’t even so much as collapse.

Note: charming wooden things that look like they were stolen from the Three Bears’ vacation or Charlie Brown’s garage are made better than a lot of the overpriced plastic crap they sell in medical catalogs. The Bookchair is made to be a single unit, with proper hinges so that you can easily fold and unfold it. When unfolded, the base of the chair has grooves to fit the support bar to create 3 different angles for the back. The pegs are more like arms, actually, screwed as to be horizontal on either side of the “seat.” Since the pegs are horizontal, you don’t have to worry so much about pulling the page around them, as you would with vertical pegs. I think they have a slight springiness in them, so that they can account for the way the pages sometimes bulge out. They fit against the pages tightly enough to hold them, but not so tightly that you can’t move the page when you need to.

Actually inserting the book is very easy — open the book to the desired page, lift it up by the top with one hand, and set it behind the pegs. If it’s a heavy book, of course, it takes me a couple of tries because my good hand is now not so good, but that’s not the chair’s fault. To turn a page, sometimes I don’t even need to adjust the right side peg — just move the page out from behind, and flick my thumb or finger to move the left side peg out of the way. Often, the left side peg will fall back into place by itself to hold the page. I don’t understand the Amazon review in which some guy complains that his wife — who, like me, is hemiplegic — can’t hold the device and turn the page at the same time. You don’t have to hold the device and turn the page at the same time. The most you need is good fine motor use of a finger or thumb on the same hand to flick a peg out of the way as you turn the page.

The only potential issue is the multi-size one, because you need to pay attention. (Why the heck did the people complaining about books not fitting order the Medium size for a hardcover math textbook?) If you mostly just read paperbacks, you should be fine with the medium size. If you read different types of books, however, you may need a larger size as well. I can’t see reading my C++ books on anything but a large Bookchair. The need for more than one might suck. However, if your large books aren’t quite so thick as that, the Standard size may be “just right” for both your paperbacks and your other books. I tried a couple book holders that seemed to be more universal, such as the Fellowes and Roberts, but they were multi-piece and rather flimsy and the pegs didn’t keep my place well enough, besides being vertical.

The Bookchair can be found on the Thinking Gifts website, though you might want to select US dollars from the drop-down so as to get the accurate price for you. You can pay with your PayPal account if you have one, which is also convenient. If you don’t want to wait for the UK shipping, you can often find them used on Amazon or eBay, where there’s a better chance that the seller might be closer (and cheaper).

Categories: Disability · Technology
Tagged: , , ,

Stress relief for word people

December 31, 2008 · Leave a Comment

I am always more at home in printed English, be it in books or DVDs with the captions on, just because it’s more accessible and expressive and stable. Sometimes, though, it’s more than that. There are times I just need to see printed words in front of my eyes: a kind of silent-printed-English white noise. Spoken English is just so much babble when I’ve been awake for too long, or when I’m well worried about something, or I can’t take the level of screaming swear words going on in other rooms. Glancing over a few words on a page is the equivalent of wearing smooth a worry stone. To do that, I need an excuse — trying to concentrate on the plot of a novel won’t work, because I’m sacrificing the entertainment for the visual/sensory aspect and would need to return to the book later when I actually wanted to read it. Having half registered the story already, I’d feel like I’d already read it even though technically I hadn’t, I’d just run my eyes over it. So, that doesn’t work. What does work, however, is an etymological dictionary.

An etymological dictionary isn’t like your average Webster’s or American Heritage paperback. It doesn’t give you usage or regional notes or tell you what anything means — it tells you all the words that borrowed and branched and blurred to make up a single entry for an English word.Etymological dictionaries tend to be a little pricey since they tend also to be thick and usually hardcover, so about six years ago I bought the first dirt-cheap ex-library copy I could find for 10 bucks.

The one I have is out of print — the older hardcover edition of Origins by Eric Partridge. (The paperback is being reissued on January 4, but it’s expensive: about $60. Try Amazon or ABEBooks. Check your local library for older editions and keep renewing, if you have to.) I don’t know what its merits are compared to other dictionaries, because I haven’t read any other dictionaries like that. I don’t know if any of the entries are definitive; many are annotated with the abbreviation for “possibly.” But it’s pleasantly dizzying, just trying to follow chain after chain of words and to speculate on how it must have happened. Raw poetry, almost.

Even following, though, isn’t required. If you have synesthesia, attach facial expressions or gestures to words, or are adept at creating sound symbolism, just looking down the list is the comfort — something like caffeine, or soft clothes [insert comfort object here].

Categories: Disability · books
Tagged: , , , ,

Assistive technology for making music: low-tech

November 13, 2008 · Leave a Comment

Contrary to the state of my hands, I have always wanted to play music. Sometimes there’s just no other way of getting rid of pent-up energy. Stimming to recorded music just won’t do it sometimes. If anyone thought to suggest music to me, they would usually suggest something like hanging a triangle from a stand, or tapping on a woodblock with a wooden stick. I discounted the suggestions — I am much more of a string person. I prefer bowed strings, but at this point playing any bowed instrument is beyond me. However, I finally found an almost hands-free stringed instrument which, though its appearance is simple enough, is capable of playing actual melody. It’s easily found and relatively cheap, too. I am just thrilled. 

The instrument itself has several names. Officially, it appears to be a Russian gusli. One lay term is a lap harp (not to be confused with the Celtic variety). Another is a plucked psaltery or dulcimer. Another is board zither. I think my favorite name is the brand given to the one I have, which comes from Belarus. I can’t input Cyrillic script, but it looks like “Nepenenoyka” and is pronounced something like “Perepelochka.” This means “little bird,” or possibly “little quail.” Since nobody can agree on what to call it, it is often marketed as a “Melody Harp” or “Music Maker.” Very often, it is assumed to be a toy (in fact it won a platinum Oppenheim Toy Award and the Parents’ Choice), but make no mistake — while it is very good for children because it doesn’t require formal music knowledge, it is a real musical instrument. Adults — particularly dulcimer players — seem to like them as well, and some luthiers make them as seriously as they make their fiddles and guitars.

The Perepelochka is simply a hardwood trapezoid with 8 strings wound across it, but in such a way as to create 15 strings. There are 15 notes. The instrument is often tuned to make two octaves of the G major scale, but can be tuned other ways to match the song you want to play. It is tuned by turning a key on the pins. A T-shaped handle key is better if you have trouble gripping, and should be easy for a helper too if you need to ask. While the instrument can be held, you do not need to — setting it on your lap or a table is fine, and gives it projection besides. The instrument has a kind of faraway Middle-Eastern twang, but reminds me also of noon and 6 o’clock churchbell tunes with the resonance.

You do not need to finger the strings, because the scale is already in front of you; each string is a note. To play the Perepelochka, you can do several things depending on your disability. If you have full use of one hand, you can pluck the strings with your separate fingers. If you are able to hold a guitar pick, you can hit the strings with that. If you’re not able to hold a guitar pick, there are ringed picks that you can wear on your thumb. Or, you can glue the pick to something, like a wooden dowel, and slip it into a utensil cuff if you have one. That way you play it using your arm, not your hand. If you have a typing stick, you may not even need a pick — just slip the typing stick over your hand and use that for a more muted “practice” sound. If you cannot use your arms, you could use a mouth stick. I don’t know if using a mouth stick would be awkward if the instrument were laying flat, but if it were, there are articulating arms. I would imagine that you could mount a lap harp also, as long as you’re careful not to crack the wood. I’m not sure, however. Failing that, you could try propping it vertically against something.

The “sheet music” for the Perepelochka isn’t the kind of sheet music you’re used to seeing. There are no clefs or staves, and you don’t need a music stand. The music is shaped like the instrument, and you put it underneath the strings. The notes line up with their corresponding strings, and you basically “connect the dots” by plucking the strings in order. Much of the available sheet music is children’s tunes, but there are also Russian, Irish, and Appalachian folk tunes, as well as some popular tunes, carols and others. If you do have some musical knowledge, they have blank sheets on which you can diagram transcriptions of songs you like. Or, if you have good pitch, you can play anything you want by ear if the keys fit.

The lap harp is sold by several people under several brands. Hearthsong, a mail-order toy company, sells a Romanian-made “Melody Harp.”  (NOTE: the “Melody Harp” is tuned for C.) First Act used to sell a lap harp as well as a smaller toddler version called “Discovery,” but apparently it has been discontinued except for the mini version. (You can, however, still find tuning information and MP3 samples on their website.) First Act lap harps are sometimes found on eBay, often still in their boxes. If you feel like you could get serious, Bill Berg and T.K. O’Brien are Appalachian luthiers who make lap harps either plain or with carvings.

As far as I know, outside of thrift stores and eBay, the only place you can find the “Music Maker” Perepelochka-brand lap harp is the European Expressions website. PLEASE NOTE: European Expressions offers a more decorative (and more expensive) “adult” model called the Yerbonitsa, but as far as I can tell there is no functional difference between them except that the Yerbonitsa is slightly broader. The number of strings as well as the tuning are identical. (And frankly, I don’t think the Perepelochka looks childish at all. I like that plain red bird. Besides, Berg’s and O’Brien’s harps are grownup and they’re shaped just like it.)

Categories: Disability
Tagged: , , ,

Going low-tech: the “Stress Owl”

October 3, 2008 · Leave a Comment

stress owl

stress owl

So, there’s this bird on my keyboard table. I don’t know why, but he looks like he’s sulking — a sort of fuzzy two-year-old who’d stomp his talons if he could. While he’s busy pouting, I’ll introduce you. His name is Ulk, and he is also the inspiration for the stupid “Library Owl” story. Ulk is short for ulchabhán, which is Irish for “owl,” the word itself a kenning — “white beard.” Ulk doesn’t have any beard, and besides he’s yellow — short and squat and squishy. But I do like kennings, and after all he is an owl. Stuffed, besides, which means I can call him any silly thing I want.

What’s he doing on my keyboard table (or an AT blog, come to think of it)? Grip strengthening, primarily. Somehow I like squashing something better if it makes me laugh in the process. Beats Silly Putty. (I have to say, I never thought that would be a medical implement. But they have Wii therapy now too, so I’m not that surprised.) Definitely beats your average stress ball, for which I don’t have the coordination. So… meet the Stress Owl.

Other useful low-tech devices for getting around manual tasks, not necessarily in order:

1. Your own teeth. Very versatile.
2. Other humans.
3. Typing sticks. Not necessarily the same as mouthsticks, though they can be. Fatiguing and occasionally crampy for extended typing, but useful in stints or with word completion/shorthand.
4. Book holders.
5. Utensil cuffs.
6. Dressing sticks, zipper pulls and buttonhooks.
7. Bottle and jar openers.
8. Skechers lace-less sneakers.
9. Circulation gloves, with or without the fingertips.
10. Your own Stress Owl (or bunny, or porcupine, or Frankenstein).

I’ll modify as I think of more. Also, www.abledata.com has an extensive database.

Categories: Disability
Tagged: , , ,